Next 2 Home Daycare Operator in Flatbush Receives Maximum Prison Sentence

1123 Flatbush Avenue, via Google Street View in 2013

Owen Larman, 44, of Prospect-Lefferts Gardens, was sentenced today to the maximum of 7 ½ to 15 years in prison by Brooklyn Supreme Court Justice Guy Mangano. The jury convicted him earlier this month of second-degree grand larceny, third-degree bribery, 11 counts of second-degree criminal possession of a forged instrument and 11 counts of first-degree offering a false instrument for filing.

Owen Larman via Brooklyn District Attorney’s Office

According to trial testimony, between 2007 and 2011, the defendant opened three daycare centers in Flatbush under the name Next to Home.

The centers, serving infants, toddlers and school-age children, were primarily paid through ACS vouchers given to families to cover some or all of the cost of childcare services. The defendant stole approximately $51,667 in voucher funds from ACS between June 2012 and April 2013, according to the District Attorney.

1159 Flatbush Avenue location Via Google Street view in August 2011.

In August 2011, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) found that the center located at 1159 Flatbush Avenue that contained an after-school program was grossly overcrowded with inadequate staff to supervise the children.

The DOHMH, the City agency responsible for inspecting all group childcare facilities in New York City, measured the space and had issued a new permit in August 2011 allowing only seven children of school age to be on the premises – the defendant had over 78 children at the after-school center previously. From the Brooklyn DA’s Office press release:

“According to trial testimony, following the issuance of the new permit permitting only seven school-age children at the 1159 Flatbush Avenue center, the defendant’s common practice was to misrepresent the number of children at his centers by having employees take some of the children temporarily off-site and hold them on buses in parking lots when he knew an inspection was about to occur.

Additionally, the buses used by the centers were frequently overcrowded and unequipped to properly transport young children, at times with two to three infants sitting in one car seat and with older children holding infants when car seats were not available.

In October 2011, the defendant applied to the New York State Office of Children and Family Services (OCFS) for a permit for Next to Home to open a new center for school-age children at 5566 Kings Highway in East Flatbush. OCFS is the State agency responsible for issuing registrations for childcare programs serving school-age children. In December 2011, OCFS issued the defendant a permit to run a center at the Kings Highway location for up to 80 school-age children.

5566 Kings Highway via Google Street view in June 2011

The owner of 5566 Kings Highway, however, never issued the defendant a lease for this location. The next month, in January 2012, the defendant applied to ACS to receive childcare vouchers for children at that location, which ACS approved. Next to Home, however, never operated a childcare center at 5566 Kings Highway.

The Acting District Attorney said that, despite the nonexistence of a center at 5566 Kings Highway, the defendant went on to file 11 false forms with ACS from June 2012 to April 2013 stating that school-age children with ACS vouchers were receiving childcare services at that location.

The forms were, in fact, for some children still receiving services at 1159 Flatbush Avenue in violation of DOHMH’s new registration and license for the site. The forms submitted by the defendant also contained the names of children who were not receiving any services by Next to Home Childcare. Further, the defendant forged the signature of a former Next to Home employee – an educational director – on each form, which required the signature of an approved signatory, such as an educational director at the site.

Relying on these false representations, ACS created and submitted 11 invoices to an outside payment vendor, which stated that Next to Home was entitled to payment for childcare services rendered at the Kings Highway location. As a result, the vendor paid Next to Home approximately $51,667, which was deposited into a bank account controlled by the defendant.

Additionally, some of the children for whom Next to Home received ACS voucher payments did not receive any childcare service from Next to Home at any location. From September 2011 to October 2012, the defendant submitted 10 false forms to ACS claiming that two children received childcare services at the Kings Highway Location and at 1159 Flatbush Avenue, when in fact those two children did not receive any childcare service from Next to Home during the time claimed on the forms.

The Acting District Attorney said that, according to trial testimony, the defendant was able to accomplish the theft by bribing an ACS employee to fax him the ACS forms for the Kings Highway location each month. The ACS forms normally had to be mailed each month to the provider’s center, but since the defendant did not actually operate out of 5566 Kings Highway, he was unable to receive mail there.

The ACS employee would fax the defendant the form each month, enabling him to fill it out and return it to ACS for payment. Between May 2011 and January 2014, the defendant returned forms to the ACS employee at least monthly, each time handing the employee $100 to $300 in cash. The ACS employee also was arrested and charged but signed a cooperation agreement and testified against the defendant at trial. “

Comment policy


  1. “…the defendant was able to accomplish the theft by bribing an ACS employee.” YUP. ACS. Brilliant.

  2. is this a direct press release? referring to the guy as “the defendant” is not standard practice in actual journalism, but there’s no by-line either so who the hell knows.

  3. Paragraph five says “From the Brooklyn DA’s Office press release:” and yes, what comes after is verbatim.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here