Southern Brooklyn

Lady Moody’s House Is One Of Nearly 100 NYC Sites That May Be Removed From Landmark Consideration

Source: Brooklyn Historical Society
Source: Brooklyn Historical Society

Almost 100 sites across the city — including our own Lady Deborah Moody’s House in Gravesend — could lose the chance of achieving landmark status in an effort by the Landmarks Preservation Commission to clear up a decades-old backlog of items, reports DNAinfo.

There are 94 sites and two historic districts that have been on the LPC’s calendar for consideration for decades — DNAinfo notes that 31 have been sitting there for 40 or more years — and the LPC hopes to push them aside to allow the commission to focus on new work.

“This is all about clearing out projects that are not active so we can focus on ones that are,” LPC chairwoman Meenakshi Srinivasan told the Times.

Preservationists are concerned about this action not only because it could potentially lead to historic buildings being torn down, but because the public hasn’t been given enough time to weigh in and testify.

“Previous landmark commissions voted that these sites should be considered as landmarks so they deserve their day in court,” Simeon Bankoff, executive director of the preservation organization Historic Districts Council, told DNAinfo.

State Assemblyman Steven Cymbrowitz echoed that sentiment today in a statement.

“The Lady Deborah Moody House is an irreplaceable piece of Brooklyn history dating back before the American Revolution and it therefore deserves to be protected from random demolition,” Cymbrowitz said. “Removing the house from landmarks consideration, and doing so without any formal public input, shows a lack of respect for Brooklyn’s past and deprives residents of the right to weigh in regarding the house’s fate.”

Gravesend historic sign
Lady Deborah Moody’s House (27 Gravesend Neck Road) — which has been awaiting approval for landmark status since 1966 — was never lived in by its namesake, who established Gravesend in the 1600s. The house was built on land owned by the Englishwoman some time around 1700, possibly by the Van Sicklen family, according to Brownstoner. Across the street from the home are historic Van Sicklen and Gravesend cemeteries, as well as a plaque commemorating the historic origins of Gravesend and Lady Moody herself.

In addition to Lady Moody’s House, the sites include several churches (like St. Augustine’s on 6th Avenue in Park Slope), Green-Wood Cemetery, the Snug Harbor Historic District in Staten Island, and more.

The commission is set to vote on the issue at an LPC meeting on December 9. Even if they’re removed, sites with a lot of public support could be reconsidered for landmark designation in the future — if they’re still around for that.

With additional reporting by Rachel Silberstein.

Comment policy


  1. This is sign that the current administration is even more committed to eradcating our history than any other before it. Pressure is being put on the members to free up valuable real estate for development. While it is not likely that the Platt-Hicks House (aka Lady Moody’s House) will be demolished in the forseeable, the owner would be free to make any changes he desires. As there is a long history of alterations made before LPC this will likely occur. Major ones would disqualify the house for inclusion. As things currently are, the owners must inform LPC if they wish to make changes to the structure. IF LPC refuses a final determination would be made as to designation within 40 days. Most owners would rather not take the chance that approval would be given.

  2. Crapola! All this erasing of history for new condos, Chain stores and coffee shops. I can understand times change but preserving some of history is important. Our long history is part of makes us unique and gives it it’s charm. Enough!

  3. It’s all about the money so developers can make a windfall so anyone with political connections can be rewarded. Absolutely ridiculous.

    The same crap is being pulled with banning horse carriages in Central Park. Nothing to do with animal welfare. The city just wants to reward developers so they can build high rises where the stables are located. The real estate industry contributed to the mayor’s campaign and this is their reward.

  4. Workout instruments tend to be, therefore, really used by those who’re possibly over weight, or maybe people with TRX Australia experienced physical problems that avoid them by participating in high-impact physical exercises.
    Frequency Rates of speed along with Settings. Can you may have learned in which not so quick volume rumbling are good for weightloss in addition to Trx Workouts blood flow, although high volume moaning aid to sculpt the entire body.
    These wise machines usually are praised as the following generating of workout equipment. You is an acronym or maybe sits your plate and the vibrations make the TRX Australia tissues from the shape internet marketing activated, as they might be while in ordinary training.
    In truth, a ten small training making use of the denture would wish a 1 hour work out if perhaps was standing for good terrain. Moaning dishes not only able at forming within the physique the truth is, the vibrations Trx Workouts exercising might assist with lower lumpy skin.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here