Politics

Brooklyn Councilmembers Oppose Half of Right to Know Act

0
Councilmember Jumaane Williams opposes the current form of Intro 182,
along with Councilmember Brad Lander (Photo courtesy Jumaane Williams’ office)

Brooklyn Councilmembers Brad Lander and Jumaane Williams have come out in opposition of part of the Right to Know Act, calling the current iteration of Intro 182 “watered down” and “significantly less effective.”

The bill, sponsored by Bronx Councilmember Ritchie Torres (D-15), would require police officers making a stop to identify themselves with business cards and give a reason for the stop.

As dealmaking and negotiation have brought the bill closer to being passed, concessions have limited the stops in which police must identify themselves to those in which there is a suspicion of criminal activity. In Lander and Williams’ statement, they assert this would exclude “the majority of police-civilian stops, as well as traffic stops. Removing these provisions strikes at the heart of what the original Right to Know Act aimed to accomplish.”

Bklyner reporting is supported by our subscribers and:

The bill was first introduced in 2014, and Lander and Williams are willing to wait a little longer to ensure an effective bill passes. “For an issue so important, a cause so vital, we believe that it is worth the investment of time and 212energy to address it correctly,” they concluded.

Advocacy groups like the NYCLU also announced their opposition to the bill, taking to Twitter and encouraging constituents to contact their councilmembers:

The other half of the Right to Know Act, Councilmember Antonio Reynoso’s Intro 541, which would force police to inform those they stop about their rights regarding consent to searches, is expected to pass when the council votes.

Subscriptions from readers fund our reporting. Subscribe for $5/month. Thank you.

Advertisement
Comment policy

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here