Funds Collected From Traffic Fines Decrease, Despite City’s Expansion Of Speed Camera Enforcement


red light speed cameras
While the news that New York City will expand speed camera enforcement across the five boroughs was met with conspiratorial sneering from local drivers, revenue data suggests that the overall amount of funds collected for traffic fines has declined every year for the past four years despite the expansion of camera-enforcement programs.

That’s not to say there’s not money being made: the city pulled in more than $55 million in fiscal year 2014 (which ended on June 30), and 75 percent of that was from camera-based enforcement. The city budget for 2015 already presumes a jump to $62 million in revenue, with an even larger percentage coming from camera enforcement.

The New York City Independent Budget Office released a new infographic yesterday that charts the amount of revenue collected from traffic fines from 1999 to the present, and also shows the share of those collections that came via police-issued violations, red-light cameras, bus-lane cameras and the newest enforcement tool: speed cameras. Some of the takeaways?

  • The proportion of revenue generated by cameras has grown from just 38 percent in 1999 to 75 percent in 2014.
  • The amount of revenue in 2014 is nearly double that collected in 1999. (Adjusted for inflation, the jump is less stark; the increase is just under $13 million.)
  • Since 2004, actual revenue from police-issued traffic violations has been on a steady decline, marginally offsetting some of the increases from camera enforcement.
  • Red-light camera revenues are the lowest they’ve been since 2007, the year before a massive expansion of the program, suggesting that camera enforcement won’t drive revenues forever.

There are two big spikes in the graph, one in 2008 and another in 2011.

The first coincided with an increase in the number of red light cameras installed around the city. After the increase, there’s a drop again. That’s probably because once drivers figure out where the cameras are, they make sure to abide by the law.

The 2011 spike came as a result of a ruling that unpaid red light summonses can count towards the threshold needed for the city to tow your car for unpaid tickets. Delinquent motorists who saw their cars impounded had to pay back those fines that year to reclaim their vehicles.

The two newest forms of camera revenue are also seeing pretty rapid growth as drivers have yet to adjust to them. Bus-lane cameras were introduced in 2011 as part of the Select Bus Service program. As that program has steadily expanded across the five boroughs, so has the number of cameras, and thus the number of violations.

Speed cameras were introduced in early 2014, with just 20 in school zones around the city. That led to $2.1 million in fines collected. But the program has been approved for massive expansion, with 120 new cameras on the way.

The city is projecting it will put $7.6 million in city coffers, but if the historical spikes from the expansion of red light cameras are any indication, it’ll probably rake in more than that before falling off over a few years.

So is it about money? It’s anybody’s guess. There’s definitely a historical increase in revenues collected but it’s not as staggering as one would think, given the massive expansion of these programs. And the data here suggests the gains appear short-lived as drivers learn to follow the rules of the road.

Here’s the above chart in an interactive format. Hover over each of the bars to see how much actual revenue was received for each method:

Comment policy


  1. “And the data here suggests the gains appear short-lived as drivers learn to follow the rules of the road.” — HAHAAHAHAHHAHAA! (the last part of that sentence) No, drivers learn to avoid being caught. The magic of the speed cameras is that no one knows where they are. They can and do move. It might actually have some lasting effects like you suggest (unlike the red light cameras).

    The fact is that the 35 speed cameras have issued almost as many tickets in the month of June as the NYPD has issued the WHOLE YEAR so far. And the speed cameras only issue a ticket during school hours *and* only if the driver is 11+ mph over the limit. So, 39 mph down Rugby Rd at 2:30pm, no problem. 55 mph down Rugby Rd at 4:15pm, no problem.

    I really wish the revenue angle wasn’t always played up.

    Do you want to know the REAL issue… There were over 400,000 red light camera violations during an approx. 13-month period (April 2013 – mid-May 2014). 8,304 unique vehicles received 3 or more violations each. 31 received 6 or more — including 8 vehicles with 10 or more!! Yes, or
    more… The winner is a douchebag cruising around on Rockaway
    Blvd/Conduit Ave/Beach Channel Drive with Texas plates. 14 red light
    camera violations! The runners up are 3 NY plates and another Texas
    plate with 12 violations each. What’s special about this second Texas
    drive is that he racked up these 12 violations in only 3-1/2 months!!

    The massive quantity of red light violations should scare the hell out of you! And these are just the ones captured by the limited number of red light cameras. And 48,517 speeding tickets captured by 35 speed cameras during June!? (NY Post) Why is this a “revenue” issue? We should be OUTRAGED that the NYPD allows the behavior on the streets that we see every day…. the behavior that KILLS someone, on average, every other day!!

    The statistics for 2013 would be 33 pedestrians injured by a collision
    with a motor vehicle *every* day in NYC and someone killed every other
    day. There’s an average of 557 motor vehicle crashed every day.

    But we should worry about “nickel and diming” the poor poor drivers that are just trying to make it through their tough day, right?!

Comments are closed.